::estonian drum'n'bass forum:: ::estonian drum'n'bass forum:: > ::english forum:: > DUBPLATES > Bladetone - Eye 12 votes / 7.92
   
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Bladetone
01/04/2008 20:44

Bladetone - Eye

New full vocal liquid

 



( i don't think that vocal is too gay, just a little bit.):)
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
vxn
02/04/2008 18:19

awesome, deserves a release, imho ;D
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
kristjan
02/04/2008 18:48

pretty good.. am chillin allright
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
C.M.
03/04/2008 05:40

musically it wouldn't be nothing special without the vocals, so its more like a bootleg or remix not your original track. the drums sound quite good though.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
kristjan
03/04/2008 06:51

yep..drums are perfect almoust to me
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Bladetone
03/04/2008 07:33

We'll see often tunes, where artist uses acapella or acapella phrases and in name hasn't remarked like bootleg or remix.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
24-bit
03/04/2008 10:16

I totally agree with cm. if you'd use only some phrases of an acapella on your own idea/melody to add some effect or "human touch" it would be ok, but in this case the author(s) should be the one(s) who wrote the melody and lyrics not the one who played in a couple of key's that fit the stolen melody. Yes, there are tunes that have wrong author names and that's a shame.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Bladetone
03/04/2008 10:29

artist who made original vocals is absolutely fine with that, to name this track rmx or not, main concept is that i can share this tune, but i can't make money without his permission..
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Bladetone
03/04/2008 10:33

24-bit:
I totally agree with cm. if you'd use only some phrases of an acapella on your own idea/melody to add some effect or "human touch" it would be ok, but in this case the author(s) should be the one(s) who wrote the melody and lyrics not the one who played in a couple of key's that fit the stolen melody. Yes, there are tunes that have wrong author names and that's a shame.


Here's nothing stoled, acapella shared artist himself in one of the public acapella site. as far as i don't make money without his presmission is all good(y)
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
C.M.
03/04/2008 10:42

Bladetone:
Here's nothing stoled, acapella shared artist himself in one of the public acapella site. as far as i don't make money without his presmission is all good(y)


that woun't change the fact that it's not your idea and melody. It's the easiest way to produce a vocal track that sounds musically great, but it shows your lack of own ideas.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Bladetone
03/04/2008 10:46

melody is mine, only acapella is by original artist.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
24-bit
03/04/2008 10:55

Bladetone:
artist who made original vocals is absolutely fine with that, to name this track rmx or not, main concept is that i can share this tune, but i can't make money without his permission..


so why didn't you name the track a rmx to show some respect to the original author of the melody and lyrics? that doesn't make a diference if its legal or illegal, does it?
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
SC9
03/04/2008 10:56

C.M.:
that woun't change the fact that it's not your idea and melody. It's the easiest way to produce a vocal track that sounds musically great, but it shows your lack of own ideas.


say it to marcus intalex, high contrast..and etc. ;D pfffff

btw gut work bladetone!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
C.M.
03/04/2008 10:57

Bladetone:
melody is mine, only acapella is by original artist.


the acapella defines the melody in this track. so the vocalist sings your melody? lol
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
C.M.
03/04/2008 11:07

i haven't sayed it sounds bad. it sounds good. you've got the mixing skills, but for me the idea of a track is the main thing that counts. so you've done a good job as a remixer not as a songwriter.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
SC9
03/04/2008 11:15

so in your opinon all liquid d/b prod. is remixers ? ) ofkorzzzz except London Electricity and over 2 guys , maybe 3... : D

???
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dr3xl
03/04/2008 11:21

um, almost every sample-based d&b producer is technically a remixer.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
C.M.
03/04/2008 11:22

dr3xl:
um, almost every sample-based d&b producer is technically a remixer.


totally agree, but it makes a diference if u use a full-length acapella and build up a whole track on it or combine acapella phrases with your own melody.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
inZtance
03/04/2008 11:23

sounds good, a bit cliche, but good! 8p
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Bladetone
03/04/2008 11:36

Thread came popular, nice.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Ekva
05/04/2008 11:15

cm, stfu!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Ekva
05/04/2008 11:18

good tune btw!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
3y6
05/04/2008 17:35

comon, stop this acapella-author bla bla shit
dont care, what has been stolen from where.
tune is good - fact.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
S127
08/04/2008 12:39

to be honest its one of the best tracks i have heard in here, so enjoy it has it is and stop this negative feedback :)
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
[G-Ruff]
09/04/2008 23:28

now that's extremely not bad. very radio-ready.

like it.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
-glide-
11/04/2008 06:08

CM STFU.

tune is great.
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
   Post A Reply